THE FIVE "DANCING" ISRAELIS ARRESTED ON 911

On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"

A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.

The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. (1)

Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2)

"They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)

[T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4)

Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)

The FBI sent out an alert to area cops, reading: "Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack . . . Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion." (7)

"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (8)

One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:

Dispatcher: Jersey City police.

Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.

Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.

Dispatcher: He has what?

Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (9)

(*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")

Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey.

When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!

According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (10)

Why did he feel that Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?

The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (11)

The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (12)

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (13)

TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (14).

What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (15), the New York Post (16), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (17) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (18), and Yediot America, (19) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.

From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (20)

A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (21).

It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (22). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (23)

[S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.

Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (24)

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11?

It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:

1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.

2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.

3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.

4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.

5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.

6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.

Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (25)

The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.

We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!

But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:

"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (26)

You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?

A number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (27)

Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9-11 by the FBI:

USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (28)

When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” (29)

One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (31). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories." (32)

9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of responsibility

Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (33) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?

Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfil what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (34)

The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.

See also...


Two Mossad Agents Caught inside Mexico City's Congress with C-4, nine grenades, and Glocks with 53 ounds of extra clips on 10-11-01, exactly one month later.

Actual FOIA-released Police Radio tapes of Van of Explosives Detained at the GeorgeWasington Bridge

Is Bolshevist Oppression Coming to America?

Is Bolshevist Oppression Coming to America?

Many have asked how the Russians and Ukrainians allowed themselves to be taken over and massacred by a handful of Marxist Jews. Many have asked how the Nazis were able to turn cosmopolitan and modern Germany into a racist, supremacist, totalitarian and repressive state, on the Judaic model. In the future, will they ask how Americans allowed a handful of Jewish elite to take away their rights, rob their wealth, and dupe them into illegal aggressive war (note that the three horrors are intertwined like the cords of a hangman's noose)?

HATE BILL MOVES FORWARD IN SENATE By Rev. Ted Pike

Different Era, Same Tactics

The Rothschilds buried Russia with war and debt and then cut off Russia's access to funds in the international money markets, while plunging Russia into the Russo-Japanese War and then World War I. The Rothschilds not only cut Russia off from the money markets, they covertly funded the Japanese and Jewish "revolutionaries" to destroy Russia. Racist Jews will tell you that these easily proven facts are an "anti-Semitic canard". The Rothschilds bankrupted Egypt and then used Egypt's plight as a manufactured opportunity to buy the Suez Canal. The Rothschilds bankrupted the Turkish Empire in order to steal Palestine.

Today, Jews employ the same tactics. Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is using the power of World Jewry to bankrupt Iran. The Israelis stole the Palestinians' funds to drive them into desperation and then fomented the Palestinian civil war. Not only was this predictable behavior, I warned it would happen long ago.

How did I know? I knew because World Jewry is simply acting today as it always has to destroy its neighbors through economic means.

Netanyahu departs for U.S. in bid to increase pressure on Iran

Takahashi Korekiyo, the Rothschilds and the Russo-Japanese War, 1904–1907

1919 Army Report Identifies Zionist and American Complicity in Bolshevik Revolution

Give 'em Hell Alan

Give 'em Hell Alan

I'm a big Alan Watt listener...I hardly ever miss a blurb. He's really the one that convinced me to start this current journey.

His latest, dated July 11, 2007 and entitled "Superheroes to Supermen to Supersimpletons - Agenda for the Young" is some of his best speaking ever.

http://cuttingthrough.jenkness.com/Blurbs/Alan_Watt_Blurb_Superheroes_to_Supermen_to_Supersimpletons_July112007.mp3

Get on over there!

How influential is the Media Really?

How influential is the Media Really?

By Curt Maynard

Subjectively, Americans are basically in agreement that the media is influential, and occasionally too influential as represented by polls.

Polls themselves are essentially simple surveys, but can be extremely insightful in many respects, especially when attempting to derive a simple answer from a complex problem or situation.

According to a Pew Research Center study conducted in April of 2000, the majority of Americans turn to the television for news. This proclivity is quite detrimental in a crisis – just look at the aftermath of 9-11, an obvious government false flag operation if ever there was one. Americans were entirely reliant on the news for any and all information about what happened that day - Americans trusted the news networks to tell them the truth, they trusted their government as well, sadly, both let us down and to such an extent that they can no longer be trusted gain – ever again!

Another study, (Van Eijck. Koen, Van Rees, Kees, 2000) published in the journal Communication Research showed conclusive evidence that reading had declined overall, as a result of television viewing. The study conducted in Europe emphasized that people that had once read for the purpose of personal gratification in 1975, had generally turned to the television by 1995 and for the same purpose - gratification. However those that read for informational purposes in 1975 employ television viewing for purposes other than acquiring serious information (Van Eijck et all, 2000). This study effectively indicates that television has become a more dominant source of entertainment among the majority of the Dutch population since 1975. However, according to the research, those that sought serious information in 1975 by reading still sought sources other than television in 1995.

Nothing has changed in this respect, today those curious and/or intelligent enough continue to seek out honest information, but they’ve turned to the blogs as they no longer trust the media, whether it be print or television, and don’t mind reading news in order to acquire good, decent, uncensored information.

Unfortunately there is another element in the equation, the apathetic television viewer, the couch potato, the armchair commando, the video game aficionado, you know who I’m talking about. These people make up a substantial proportion of Americas and help to bolster the American economy with their unrestrained and insatiable consumerism. The good news? They don’t really matter, most of them wouldn’t look up from the boob tube for a moment if they didn’t have to. The only way these useless creatures will ever get motivated about anything is if someone takes out the satellites and leaves them without a meaningless and degenerate program to watch.

In April 2000, people like the above were asked whether they watched television news programming regularly, to which 75% responded affirmatively (question # 5). When asked how much time they had spent watching television yesterday, excluding news programming, 57% responded that they had spent more than an hour watching television. Sixteen percent admitted to watching between two and three hours, 11% watched three to four hours, and 8% watched more than four hours of television programming (question # P.2). In 1998 Pew found that 13% of Americans regularly watched daytime talk shows like Jerry Springer or Rikki Lake (question # 16U).

One 1997 poll conducted by Hart and Teeter (1997) revealed that 79% of those polled admitted watching more than seven hours of television weekly, 24% watched more than twenty-nine hours weekly. A Scripps Howard News Survey (1993) revealed that 77% of those responding said that their television was on at least 3 hours daily, with 26% admitting that their television was on for longer than six hours daily.

In contrast to the amount of time Americans spend before the television, and the frequency in which they watch television news programming, only 15% of Americans stated that they listened to public radio regularly [Not that this matters today, public radio is every bit as bad and pro-Zionist as any television program]. In the same year 35% admitted to watching news magazine programs like Dateline regularly. Eighteen percent watched television programming like “Cops.” Ten percent of respondents admitted to watching programming like Oprah Winfrey regularly, and 12% watched Judge Judy regularly as well. For all intents and purposes, it doesn’t matter whether you watch cops or nightline, you’re equally likely to learn any facts from either.

Pew found that 12% of the respondents indicated that they read news magazines like Time, U.S. News and World Report, or Newsweek regularly. All three of these magazines are owned by huge media corporations. In the case of Time, AOL Time Warner also owns NBC and cable news networks as well. Newsweek is owned by The Washington Post Company, and U.S. News and World Report is owned by the media giant CMGI. The point is that it may be difficult to get different perspectives from different news sources if they are owned by the same corporations, which of course they are, AND the same people.

In case you haven’t been paying attention, this has been going on for a long time. Spiro Agnew, former vice president of the United States delivered a speech in Des Moines Iowa in November 1969, in which he stated, “No medium has a more profound influence [than television news] over public opinion- nowhere in our system are there fewer checks on vast power (Speech delivered in Des Moines Iowa, November 13th, 1969).

In a relatively recent interview, Nicholas Johnson, (1995) a former Federal Communication Commission (FCC) official, commented on the developing media monopoly in mass communication. “At the time of the Time-Warner merger, when company executives were asked why they were merging, Time-Warner said that according to their calculations, it would not be long before there would be five firms that control all the media on Planet Earth, and that they intended to be one of them.” Johnson later acknowledged that, “it is true that most people get most of their information from television. It is also true that fewer and fewer people, particularly young people, are reading the newspapers.” To summarize the article, the media is already monopolized by a few powerful companies, but if trends continue eventually Time-Warner’s calculations may in fact be correct.

If the above surveys are any indication of where Americans spend a good part of their time, and where they acquire the majority of their news from, one must conclude that television represents a large element.

Polls suggest that Americans also view the honesty and integrity of their government with a tremendous amount of suspicion, which is great news, because they certainly should. Remember when reading the below that these polls were taken quite some time ago, polls today reveal that American opinion of their politicians is at an all time low.

When asked in 1995, “Would you rate the level of ethics and honesty in politicians, excellent, good, not so good, or poor?”, Americans responded by and large with “not so good, and poor.” Less than 3% felt excellent was an adequate description, and 16% identified with “good.” Despite the fact that there was a Democratic president in the White House, Republicans and Democrats nearly equally agreed that the level of honesty among politicians was “not so good,” with Republicans slightly edging out Democrats 51% to 44%. This is all that more interesting, when one takes into account the fact that in 1995, when this poll was conducted, the Republicans had a majority in the house (ABC News, 1995).

In another poll comparing the honesty of Democratic and Republican office holders, it was found that the majority of those Americans surveyed felt that their politicians were of “average” honesty (Gallup Organization, 1998a, 1998b). In a more recent poll, it was revealed that American opinion concerning the level of honesty of their public officials had not changed a great deal in that the results showed that 60% of the respondents felt that it was either low, or very low. Only 3% identified a “high” level of honesty in their public officials (Princeton Survey Research Associates, 0400705).

Governments have a vested interest in maintaining calm, and preventing panic among its population for a variety of reasons, not least of which include economic stability, and order. Is it possible that the American government would encourage the mass media to assist it in the preservation of economic stability and order, even if “truth” were somewhat sacrificed, for the “collective good?” I think the reader knows the answer to that question – of course they’re lying to us, we all know it now, but somethings not right is it? Somehow we’re all being lulled into this idea that all is well, despite the fact that we all know better, or at least should.

The television unlike a book cannot be put down, and then contemplated on, and returned to without missing potentially important points either supporting or refuting ones original views – the television is a ‘passive learning’ instrument, we’re not actively engaged when viewing it, we’re sitting [or lying] back and literally allowing it to form our opinions for us. We must turn it off!

What is known about the fact that individuals tend to develop uniformed opinions, even when provided with accurate or inaccurate information is well understood in marketing circles, and is referred to as “selective distortion.” This phenomenon can occur in two primary ways. If an individual wants to believe something is not true, then even in the face of an overwhelming amount of information disputing their original contention, they will still reject what they do not want to believe. Likewise, this can happen in the same manner with an individual that wants to believe something is in fact true, no matter the amount of material refuting that belief (Futrell, 1999, Pp. 119-122).

Those who obtain the majority of their information from a single source, and then encounter another source that disputes some of their earlier beliefs, are in all likelihood going to succumb to another sales psychology principle known as brand loyalty. In a very real sense the Catholic church embraced this type of loyalty, in that it was compelled to reject the Copernican, and Galilean ideas of the sun, rather than our earth being the center of the solar system, or known universe at that time, in favor of the antiquated, but politically, and religiously acceptable terra centric Aristotelian, and Ptolemaic models. The church was so adamant about their acceptable, and “brand loyal” version, that it threatened Galileo with excommunication if he didn’t conform to their incorrect account, and denounce his accurate hypothesis (Brophy & Paolucci, 1962).

The church issued the following statement, “The doctrine that the earth is neither the center of the universe nor immovable, but moves, even with a daily rotation, is absurd, and both philosophically and theologically false, and at least an error of Faith” (Asimov, 1979, p. 275). If that is not rejection in the face of scientific empiricism, one must wonder, what a better example might be. Another well-known theologian named John Shelby Spong, devoted an entire book to the investigation of Biblical literalism, or inerrancy, embraced by so called contemporary fundamentalists, and their rejection of scientific empiricism (Spong, 1991). Spong is essentially describing the “brand loyalty” of a specific population of church goers, who are individually unaware of the bible itself, its history, relevance, and meaning, but rather rely on the interpretation of it provided by their minister or church doctrine, that Spong believes to be equally ignorant of the text. Sadly, Spong is not much better than those he seeks to condemn as fools, he’s a globalist that embraces the fallacy of multiculturalism – but he’s right on about the vast majority of those that refer to themselves as Christians and their unbelievable ignorance of history and geography.

Indeed, even the traditional macroeconomic view of advertising “holds that the main purpose of advertising is to manipulate or persuade” (McConnel, Campbell, Brue, 1996). Read those words again, “manipulate and persuade!”

Another very interesting and perhaps persuasive force contributing to opinion formation and the role the media plays is put forth by zoologist Desmond Morris (1969). “In addition to law, custom, language, and religion there is another, more violent form of cohesive force that helps to bind the members of a super-tribe “society” together, and that is war” (p.32). This is an interesting perspective if one looks for a moment at what happened as a result of September 11th, and the anthrax letters. There has been a declaration of war on terrorism. The enemy hasn’t been fully identified, the goals have not been fully established, and there is no end in sight, but yet the American people support it, or at least supported it up till now. As the American people become more informed, the alert individual can’t help but notice that the war of terror which originally was focused on without, i.e. the Mid East, has become more and more focused on the within, i.e. right here in the United States, slowly, imperceptively, the enemy has morphed from Islamo-Fascists to terrorists of the “Home grown” variety. I’ve got news for you America, our government is looking at US, you and I, especially if you’re not one of the aforementioned apathetic materialists – if you’ve got a mind and an informed opinion – YOU ARE THE TERRORIST!

Morris’s book, The Human Zoo (1969) is an excellent source of information pertinent to our modern era. “There has been a great deal of debate recently concerning the way in which modern mass-communication devices, such as televisions are shrinking the social surface of the world, creating a global televillage. It has been suggested that this trend will aid the move towards a genuinely International community. Unhappily this is a myth, for the single reason that television, unlike personal social intercourse is a one-way system” (1969, p. 36). Morris was right and wrong, television is a “one way system,” but it’s the perfect medium for ushering in the new world order, globalism or Internationalism, whatever you prefer to call it – communism to some.

Morris felt that humans were subject to forces encouraging conformity. An excellent example of the conformity principle is in the following. The external threat, “has such a powerful cohesive effect on the members of the threatened group that the leader’s task is in many ways made easier. The more daring and reckless he is, the more fervently he seems to be protecting the group who, caught up in the emotional fray, never dare question his actions (as they would in peace time), no matter how irrational these actions may be” (Morris, 1969, p. 53). Let me repeat the last sentence again, “The more daring and reckless he [the leader] is, the more fervently he seems to be protecting the group who, caught up in the emotional fray, never dare question his actions (as they would in peace time),no matter how irrational these actions may be.”

Does the War on Terrorism apply to this principle? Certainly President Bush’s popularity remained quite high initially despite the fact that he instituted many invasive and unconstitutional policies that would in all likelihood have never succeeded in the absence of an alleged external enemy – and in the case of Al Qaeda, a illusory enemy.

Perhaps this conformity principle plays some kind of role in the fact that we the American public seem satisfied at present with the information we’ve received and continue to receive from the government, by way of the media, and we do not feel the need to question higher authority at this time. OR, perhaps the media is not telling us just how many Americans are already questioning the authority of our government at this very moment.

Wake up America, the Zio-American government is very close to committing another act of terror on American soil that will dwarf what they did on 9-11. Will you be fooled again, will you allow them to conscript your sons and daughters and send them overseas to kill and die for Israel and oil? There isn’t much time left…

[1] http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/

For sources see reference section HERE

US Banking Collapse ‘Imminent’

US Banking Collapse ‘Imminent’ Warns French Banking Giant

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

French banking giant Société Générale Group, through its subsidiary SG CIB, the 3rd largest corporate and investment bank in the Euro zone, has warned today in a confidential report that the American banking system is in danger of ‘imminent collapse’ due to the hedge fund failures at US banking giant Bear Stearns, a fear that is also being voiced in America, and as we can read as reported by the New York Times News Service:

"The two big Bear Stearns hedge funds that neared collapse last week were full of tricky investments tied to subprime mortgages. To try to ensure that hundreds of billions of dollars worth of similar investments don’t also plummet, endangering the financial system, Congress may finally have to do more to help lower-end borrowers. That, in turn, would prop up the investments based on their mortgages."

Though the United States Securities and Exchange Commission has opened an ‘informal’ investigation into the collapse of the Bear Stearns hedge funds, SG CIB warns in their report that a ‘series of cascading events’ leading to the ‘insolvency’ of the American banking system is now being ‘unleashed’, and as confirmed by Britain’s Telegraph News Service:

"The United States faces a severe credit crunch as mounting losses on risky forms of debt catch up with the banks and force them to curb lending and call in existing loans, according to a report by Lombard Street Research.

The group said the fast-moving crisis at two Bear Stearns hedge funds had exposed the underlying rot in the US sub-prime mortgage market, and the vast nexus of collateralised debt obligations known as CDOs.

"Excess liquidity in the global system will be slashed," it said. "Banks' capital is about to be decimated, which will require calling in a swathe of loans. This is going to aggravate the US hard landing."

Even more catastrophic to the World’s economic system being warned about by SG CIB was the near simultaneous warning this week of a Global Great Depression by the Bank for International Settlements, and as we can read as reported, also, by Britain’s Telegraph News Service:

"The Bank for International Settlements, the world's most prestigious financial body, has warned that years of loose monetary policy has fuelled a dangerous credit bubble, leaving the global economy more vulnerable to another 1930s-style slump than generally understood.

"Virtually nobody foresaw the Great Depression of the 1930s, or the crises which affected Japan and Southeast Asia in the early and late 1990s. In fact, each downturn was preceded by a period of non-inflationary growth exuberant enough to lead many commentators to suggest that a 'new era' had arrived", said the bank.

The BIS, the ultimate bank of central bankers, pointed to a confluence a worrying signs, citing mass issuance of new-fangled credit instruments, soaring levels of household debt, extreme appetite for risk shown by investors, and entrenched imbalances in the world currency system.

In a thinly-veiled rebuke to the US Federal Reserve, the BIS said central banks were starting to doubt the wisdom of letting asset bubbles build up on the assumption that they could safely be "cleaned up" afterwards - which was more or less the strategy pursued by former Fed chief Alan Greenspan after the dotcom bust.

It said this approach had failed in the US in 1930 and in Japan in 1991 because excess debt and investment build up in the boom years had suffocating effects.

While cutting interest rates in such a crisis may help, it has the effect of transferring wealth from creditors to debtors and "sowing the seeds for more serious problems further ahead."

The bank said it was far from clear whether the US would be able to shrug off the consequences of its latest imbalances, citing a current account deficit running at 6.5pc of GDP, a rise in US external liabilities by over $4 trillion from 2001 to 2005, and an unprecedented drop in the savings rate. "The dollar clearly remains vulnerable to a sudden loss of private sector confidence," it said."

These warnings could not have come at a worse time for the war weary United States as its National debt has risen to the catastrophic level of nearly $9 trillion and is increasing at the staggering rate of over $1 billion per day.

Though the Americans represent only 4 percent of the World’s population, their economy represents 18 percent World’s economy, meaning that the collapse of their banking system will indeed have an effect on all other Nations ability to survive a Global Depression.

Russia’s President Putin, and in his also knowing of the coming collapse of the Western World’s banking and trade systems, called this week for a new World Economic Order, and as we can read:

"Speaking to an audience of world leaders and chief executives at a showcase business forum in St. Petersburg, Putin said the emergence of developing economies “demands the creation of a new architecture of international economic relations based on trust and mutually beneficial integration”.

He added, “Structures that were made taking account of a small number of active members look archaic, undemocratic and inflexible... This is clearly visible in the example of the WTO”.

The Russian leader proposed the creation of “regional Eurasian free trade organizations” that would draw on the experience of the World Trade Organization.

Russia demonstrated its new economic clout during the two-day St. Petersburg International Economic Forum by agreeing to investment accords worth 13.5 billion dollars (10 billion euros), forum organizers said.

It seemed evident that the World’s business elite had accepted Putin’s assurances during the forum that Russia was a safe bet, in spite of rising tensions between Moscow and the West.

It also reflected a wider surge in developing economies that Putin said had turned the old world order on its head.

“If 50 years ago, the G8 countries accounted for 60 percent of the World’s GDP, the current situation is vice versa -- about 60 percent of world GDP is produced beyond their borders."

To the ability of the average American citizen being able to survive an economic collapse it no longer seems likely, and as we can read:

"Personal bankruptcies during the first G. W. Bush administration totaled nearly five million, a record for any single term in the White House.

Due to the harsh bankruptcy legislation passed by Congress in 2005 the number of bankruptcies has recently declined—at least in the short term. But by making it more difficult for families to free themselves from extreme debt burdens, this is certain to produce ever greater numbers of workers who are essentially “modern-day indentured servants.”

It is also worth noting that the similarities to the present horrific circumstance facing the American people is an, almost, exact mirror imagine of that faced by their ancestors of last century whose lives were altered forever by the event known as the Great Depression, and which saw the greatest political and social realignment the United States had seen since their Civil War Period of the mid 1800’s, both of which led to the strengthening of the Federal Government at the expense of the individual States and personal freedom.

And, as their 20^th Century ancestors had World War I, the realignment of the European Continent, the realignment of the Middle East, and the Spanish Flu Pandemic; today the Americans have a Global War on Terror, the uniting of the Nations of Europe into a single Union, another realignment of the Middle East, and the Bird Flu Pandemic.

“The more things change the more they stay the same” comes to mind in pondering that which is facing the American people today, but, perhaps, the more appropriate quote for these weary people were spoken by the 19^th Century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and who in foreseeing the ‘plans’ of the World’s elite powers for humanity issued a warning to any, and all, who would listen, "Out of chaos comes order."