Wikipedia- Proof of a a disinformation tool?

Ludwig Braeckeleer Questions Wikipedia

While researching my next article about the Lockerbie bombing, I witnessed an incident that made me wonder whether intelligence agents had infiltrated Wikipedia.

Anyone who knows the universal success of Wikipedia will immediately grasp the importance of the issue. The fact that most Internet search engines, such as Google, give Wikipedia articles top ranking only raises the stakes to a higher level.

Lockerbie And It's Propaganda

In the aftermath of the Lockerbie bombing in 1988, the finger of suspicion quickly pointed to a Syria-based Palestinian organization -- the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, General Command (PFLP-GC) -- hired by Iran. The terrorist group was created by a former Syrian army captain, Ahmed Jibril, who broke away from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) in 1968.

Does The Hoax Of Entebbe Flow To Lockerbie

I had learned from a recently released U.S. National Archives file that Shin Bet, the Israeli Security Agency, had infiltrated the PFLP and helped the Entebbe hijackers (Israeli commandos rescued the hostages in Uganda in 1976), so I wanted to learn more about the link between the PFLP and the PFLP-GC. I also wanted to learn more about allegations made by David Colvin, the first secretary of the British Embassy in Paris, concerning the rather bizarre collaboration between the PFLP and the Shin Bet.

Wikipedia Erases The Shin Bet Relationship

As I could not locate the article in which I had learned about the allegations, I consulted the article on the Entebbe Operation on Wikipedia, where I knew the story had been noted. To my surprise, I found that all references to the alleged collaboration between the PFLP and the Shin Bet had been suppressed. Moreover, it is no longer possible to edit the page.

False Flags And Disinformation

Conducting false flag operations and planting disinformation in the mainstream media have long belonged to the craft of the spies. In the months preceding the 1953 overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, U.S. and U.K. intelligence agencies used both techniques abundantly.

A copy of the CIA's secret history of the coup surfaced in 2000. Written in 1954 by the Princeton professor who oversaw the operation, the story reveals that agents from the CIA and SIS (the American and British intelligence services) "directed a campaign of bombings by Iranians posing as members of the Communist Party, and planted articles and editorial cartoons in newspapers."

A Compliant Media Is Needed

The section of the report concerning the media speaks volumes: "The CIA was apparently able to use contacts at the Associated Press to put on the newswire a statement from Tehran about royal decrees that the CIA itself had written. But mostly, the agency relied on less direct means to exploit the media.

"The Iran desk of the State Department was able to place a CIA study in Newsweek, using the normal channel of desk officer to journalist. The article was one of several planted press reports that, when reprinted in Tehran, fed the war of nerves against Iran's prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh," the document said.

Bush Wants The Pentagon As A Disinformation Source

Half a century later, the technique of disinformation is as important as ever to intelligence agencies. In the aftermath of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Pentagon set up the Defense Department's Office of Strategic Influence with a mission "to provid

e news items and false information directly to foreign journalists and others to bolster U.S. policy and the war on terrorism."

The new office attracted so much criticism that the Bush administration eventually shut it down in February 2002. Even defense officials publicly denounced the dangers of such a program, which could have left the department without a shred of credibility.

"We shouldn't be in that business. Leave the propaganda leaks to the CIA, the spooks [secret agents]," a defense official said.

Is Wikipedia Harboring a Secret Agent?

According to clues accumulated by ordinary citizens around the world, it could be that the CIA and other intelligence agencies are riding the information wave and planting disinformation on Wikipedia. If so, tens of thousands of innocent and unwitting citizens around the world are translating and propagating their lies, providing these agencies with a universal news network.

The Salinger Investigation of the Pan Am 103 Bombing

Pierre Salinger was White House press secretary to Presidents John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. Salinger also served as U.S. Senator from California and a campaign manager for Robert Kennedy.

But Salinger is also famous for his investigative journalism. Hired by ABC News as its Paris bureau chief in 1978, he became the network's chief European correspondent in 1983.

During his distinguished career, Salinger broke important stories, such as the secret negotiations by the U.S. government with Iran to free American hostages in 1979-80 and the last meeting between U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie and Saddam Hussein in 1990, during which she led the Iraqi president to believe that the U.S. would not react to an invasion of Kuwait.

Salinger Investigates Pan AM 103

Salinger, who was based in London, spent a considerable amount of time and energy investigating the bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie. He and his collaborator, John Cooley, hired a young graduate, Linda Mack, to help in the investigation.

The Farce In The Netherlands

"I know that these two Libyans had nothing to do with it. I know who did it and I know exactly why it was done," Salinger said during his testimony at the Zeist trial, where one of the Libyans was convicted of murdering the 270 victims.

"That's all? You're not letting me tell the truth. Wait a minute; I know exactly who did it. I know how it was done," Salinger replied to the trial judge, Lord Sutherland, who simply asked him to leave the witness box.

"If you wish to make a point you may do so elsewhere, but I'm afraid you may not do so in this court," Lord Sutherland interrupted.

Salinger's Assistant Is Wikipedia's Primary Editors

Slim Virgin had been voted the most abusive administrator of Wikipedia. She upset so many editors that some of them decided to team up to research her real life identity.

Attempts to track her through Internet technology failed. This is suspicious in itself as the location of normal Internet users can easily be tracked. According to a team member, Slim Virgin "knows her way around the Internet and covered her tracks with care."

Daniel Brandt of the Wikipedia Review and founder of Wikipedia-Watch.org patiently assembled tiny clues about Slim Virgin and posted them on these Web sites. Eventually, two readers identified her. Slim Virgin was no other than Linda Mack, the young graduate Salinger hired.

Salinger's Other Assistant Chimes In

John K. Cooley, the collaborator of Salinger in the Lockerbie investigation, posted the following letter to Brandt on Wikipedia Review, which has been set up to discuss specific editors and editing patterns and general efforts by editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy:

She claimed to have lost a friend/lover on pan103 and so was anxious to clear up the mystery. ABC News paid for her travel and expenses as well as a salary'

Linda Mack Pointed Everything At Libya

Once the two Libyan suspects were indicted, she seemed to try to point the investigation in the direction of Qaddafi [Libyan President Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi], although there was plenty of evidence, both before and after the trials of Megrahi and Fhimah in the Netherlands, that others were involved, probably with Iran the commissioning power. [In 2001, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison; Lamin Khalifah Fhimah was acquitted.]

The Wikipedia Watch Dog Group Salinger came to believe that [first name redacted but known to be Linda] was working for [name of intelligence agency redacted but known to be Britain's MI5] and had been from the beginning; assigned genuinely to investigate Pan Am 103, but also to infiltrate and monitor us. Soon after Cooley wrote to Brandt, Linda Mack contacted him and asked him not to help Brandt in his efforts to expose her. All doubts about Slim Virgin's true identity had vanished. Today, Linda Mack is rumored to reside in Alberta, Canada, under the name of Sarah McEwan.

Ludwig Braeckeleer has a Ph.D. in nuclear sciences. He teaches physics and international humanitarian law. He blogs on The GaiaPost.

THE FIVE "DANCING" ISRAELIS ARRESTED ON 911

On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"

A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.

The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. (1)

Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2)

"They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)

[T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4)

Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)

The FBI sent out an alert to area cops, reading: "Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack . . . Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion." (7)

"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (8)

One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:

Dispatcher: Jersey City police.

Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.

Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.

Dispatcher: He has what?

Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (9)

(*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")

Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey.

When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!

According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (10)

Why did he feel that Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?

The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (11)

The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (12)

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (13)

TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (14).

What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (15), the New York Post (16), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (17) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (18), and Yediot America, (19) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.

From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (20)

A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (21).

It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (22). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (23)

[S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.

Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (24)

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11?

It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:

1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.

2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.

3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.

4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.

5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.

6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.

Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (25)

The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.

We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!

But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:

"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (26)

You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?

A number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (27)

Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9-11 by the FBI:

USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (28)

When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” (29)

One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (31). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories." (32)

9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of responsibility

Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (33) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?

Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfil what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (34)

The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.

See also...


Two Mossad Agents Caught inside Mexico City's Congress with C-4, nine grenades, and Glocks with 53 ounds of extra clips on 10-11-01, exactly one month later.

Actual FOIA-released Police Radio tapes of Van of Explosives Detained at the GeorgeWasington Bridge

Is Bolshevist Oppression Coming to America?

Is Bolshevist Oppression Coming to America?

Many have asked how the Russians and Ukrainians allowed themselves to be taken over and massacred by a handful of Marxist Jews. Many have asked how the Nazis were able to turn cosmopolitan and modern Germany into a racist, supremacist, totalitarian and repressive state, on the Judaic model. In the future, will they ask how Americans allowed a handful of Jewish elite to take away their rights, rob their wealth, and dupe them into illegal aggressive war (note that the three horrors are intertwined like the cords of a hangman's noose)?

HATE BILL MOVES FORWARD IN SENATE By Rev. Ted Pike

Different Era, Same Tactics

The Rothschilds buried Russia with war and debt and then cut off Russia's access to funds in the international money markets, while plunging Russia into the Russo-Japanese War and then World War I. The Rothschilds not only cut Russia off from the money markets, they covertly funded the Japanese and Jewish "revolutionaries" to destroy Russia. Racist Jews will tell you that these easily proven facts are an "anti-Semitic canard". The Rothschilds bankrupted Egypt and then used Egypt's plight as a manufactured opportunity to buy the Suez Canal. The Rothschilds bankrupted the Turkish Empire in order to steal Palestine.

Today, Jews employ the same tactics. Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is using the power of World Jewry to bankrupt Iran. The Israelis stole the Palestinians' funds to drive them into desperation and then fomented the Palestinian civil war. Not only was this predictable behavior, I warned it would happen long ago.

How did I know? I knew because World Jewry is simply acting today as it always has to destroy its neighbors through economic means.

Netanyahu departs for U.S. in bid to increase pressure on Iran

Takahashi Korekiyo, the Rothschilds and the Russo-Japanese War, 1904–1907

1919 Army Report Identifies Zionist and American Complicity in Bolshevik Revolution

Give 'em Hell Alan

Give 'em Hell Alan

I'm a big Alan Watt listener...I hardly ever miss a blurb. He's really the one that convinced me to start this current journey.

His latest, dated July 11, 2007 and entitled "Superheroes to Supermen to Supersimpletons - Agenda for the Young" is some of his best speaking ever.

http://cuttingthrough.jenkness.com/Blurbs/Alan_Watt_Blurb_Superheroes_to_Supermen_to_Supersimpletons_July112007.mp3

Get on over there!

How influential is the Media Really?

How influential is the Media Really?

By Curt Maynard

Subjectively, Americans are basically in agreement that the media is influential, and occasionally too influential as represented by polls.

Polls themselves are essentially simple surveys, but can be extremely insightful in many respects, especially when attempting to derive a simple answer from a complex problem or situation.

According to a Pew Research Center study conducted in April of 2000, the majority of Americans turn to the television for news. This proclivity is quite detrimental in a crisis – just look at the aftermath of 9-11, an obvious government false flag operation if ever there was one. Americans were entirely reliant on the news for any and all information about what happened that day - Americans trusted the news networks to tell them the truth, they trusted their government as well, sadly, both let us down and to such an extent that they can no longer be trusted gain – ever again!

Another study, (Van Eijck. Koen, Van Rees, Kees, 2000) published in the journal Communication Research showed conclusive evidence that reading had declined overall, as a result of television viewing. The study conducted in Europe emphasized that people that had once read for the purpose of personal gratification in 1975, had generally turned to the television by 1995 and for the same purpose - gratification. However those that read for informational purposes in 1975 employ television viewing for purposes other than acquiring serious information (Van Eijck et all, 2000). This study effectively indicates that television has become a more dominant source of entertainment among the majority of the Dutch population since 1975. However, according to the research, those that sought serious information in 1975 by reading still sought sources other than television in 1995.

Nothing has changed in this respect, today those curious and/or intelligent enough continue to seek out honest information, but they’ve turned to the blogs as they no longer trust the media, whether it be print or television, and don’t mind reading news in order to acquire good, decent, uncensored information.

Unfortunately there is another element in the equation, the apathetic television viewer, the couch potato, the armchair commando, the video game aficionado, you know who I’m talking about. These people make up a substantial proportion of Americas and help to bolster the American economy with their unrestrained and insatiable consumerism. The good news? They don’t really matter, most of them wouldn’t look up from the boob tube for a moment if they didn’t have to. The only way these useless creatures will ever get motivated about anything is if someone takes out the satellites and leaves them without a meaningless and degenerate program to watch.

In April 2000, people like the above were asked whether they watched television news programming regularly, to which 75% responded affirmatively (question # 5). When asked how much time they had spent watching television yesterday, excluding news programming, 57% responded that they had spent more than an hour watching television. Sixteen percent admitted to watching between two and three hours, 11% watched three to four hours, and 8% watched more than four hours of television programming (question # P.2). In 1998 Pew found that 13% of Americans regularly watched daytime talk shows like Jerry Springer or Rikki Lake (question # 16U).

One 1997 poll conducted by Hart and Teeter (1997) revealed that 79% of those polled admitted watching more than seven hours of television weekly, 24% watched more than twenty-nine hours weekly. A Scripps Howard News Survey (1993) revealed that 77% of those responding said that their television was on at least 3 hours daily, with 26% admitting that their television was on for longer than six hours daily.

In contrast to the amount of time Americans spend before the television, and the frequency in which they watch television news programming, only 15% of Americans stated that they listened to public radio regularly [Not that this matters today, public radio is every bit as bad and pro-Zionist as any television program]. In the same year 35% admitted to watching news magazine programs like Dateline regularly. Eighteen percent watched television programming like “Cops.” Ten percent of respondents admitted to watching programming like Oprah Winfrey regularly, and 12% watched Judge Judy regularly as well. For all intents and purposes, it doesn’t matter whether you watch cops or nightline, you’re equally likely to learn any facts from either.

Pew found that 12% of the respondents indicated that they read news magazines like Time, U.S. News and World Report, or Newsweek regularly. All three of these magazines are owned by huge media corporations. In the case of Time, AOL Time Warner also owns NBC and cable news networks as well. Newsweek is owned by The Washington Post Company, and U.S. News and World Report is owned by the media giant CMGI. The point is that it may be difficult to get different perspectives from different news sources if they are owned by the same corporations, which of course they are, AND the same people.

In case you haven’t been paying attention, this has been going on for a long time. Spiro Agnew, former vice president of the United States delivered a speech in Des Moines Iowa in November 1969, in which he stated, “No medium has a more profound influence [than television news] over public opinion- nowhere in our system are there fewer checks on vast power (Speech delivered in Des Moines Iowa, November 13th, 1969).

In a relatively recent interview, Nicholas Johnson, (1995) a former Federal Communication Commission (FCC) official, commented on the developing media monopoly in mass communication. “At the time of the Time-Warner merger, when company executives were asked why they were merging, Time-Warner said that according to their calculations, it would not be long before there would be five firms that control all the media on Planet Earth, and that they intended to be one of them.” Johnson later acknowledged that, “it is true that most people get most of their information from television. It is also true that fewer and fewer people, particularly young people, are reading the newspapers.” To summarize the article, the media is already monopolized by a few powerful companies, but if trends continue eventually Time-Warner’s calculations may in fact be correct.

If the above surveys are any indication of where Americans spend a good part of their time, and where they acquire the majority of their news from, one must conclude that television represents a large element.

Polls suggest that Americans also view the honesty and integrity of their government with a tremendous amount of suspicion, which is great news, because they certainly should. Remember when reading the below that these polls were taken quite some time ago, polls today reveal that American opinion of their politicians is at an all time low.

When asked in 1995, “Would you rate the level of ethics and honesty in politicians, excellent, good, not so good, or poor?”, Americans responded by and large with “not so good, and poor.” Less than 3% felt excellent was an adequate description, and 16% identified with “good.” Despite the fact that there was a Democratic president in the White House, Republicans and Democrats nearly equally agreed that the level of honesty among politicians was “not so good,” with Republicans slightly edging out Democrats 51% to 44%. This is all that more interesting, when one takes into account the fact that in 1995, when this poll was conducted, the Republicans had a majority in the house (ABC News, 1995).

In another poll comparing the honesty of Democratic and Republican office holders, it was found that the majority of those Americans surveyed felt that their politicians were of “average” honesty (Gallup Organization, 1998a, 1998b). In a more recent poll, it was revealed that American opinion concerning the level of honesty of their public officials had not changed a great deal in that the results showed that 60% of the respondents felt that it was either low, or very low. Only 3% identified a “high” level of honesty in their public officials (Princeton Survey Research Associates, 0400705).

Governments have a vested interest in maintaining calm, and preventing panic among its population for a variety of reasons, not least of which include economic stability, and order. Is it possible that the American government would encourage the mass media to assist it in the preservation of economic stability and order, even if “truth” were somewhat sacrificed, for the “collective good?” I think the reader knows the answer to that question – of course they’re lying to us, we all know it now, but somethings not right is it? Somehow we’re all being lulled into this idea that all is well, despite the fact that we all know better, or at least should.

The television unlike a book cannot be put down, and then contemplated on, and returned to without missing potentially important points either supporting or refuting ones original views – the television is a ‘passive learning’ instrument, we’re not actively engaged when viewing it, we’re sitting [or lying] back and literally allowing it to form our opinions for us. We must turn it off!

What is known about the fact that individuals tend to develop uniformed opinions, even when provided with accurate or inaccurate information is well understood in marketing circles, and is referred to as “selective distortion.” This phenomenon can occur in two primary ways. If an individual wants to believe something is not true, then even in the face of an overwhelming amount of information disputing their original contention, they will still reject what they do not want to believe. Likewise, this can happen in the same manner with an individual that wants to believe something is in fact true, no matter the amount of material refuting that belief (Futrell, 1999, Pp. 119-122).

Those who obtain the majority of their information from a single source, and then encounter another source that disputes some of their earlier beliefs, are in all likelihood going to succumb to another sales psychology principle known as brand loyalty. In a very real sense the Catholic church embraced this type of loyalty, in that it was compelled to reject the Copernican, and Galilean ideas of the sun, rather than our earth being the center of the solar system, or known universe at that time, in favor of the antiquated, but politically, and religiously acceptable terra centric Aristotelian, and Ptolemaic models. The church was so adamant about their acceptable, and “brand loyal” version, that it threatened Galileo with excommunication if he didn’t conform to their incorrect account, and denounce his accurate hypothesis (Brophy & Paolucci, 1962).

The church issued the following statement, “The doctrine that the earth is neither the center of the universe nor immovable, but moves, even with a daily rotation, is absurd, and both philosophically and theologically false, and at least an error of Faith” (Asimov, 1979, p. 275). If that is not rejection in the face of scientific empiricism, one must wonder, what a better example might be. Another well-known theologian named John Shelby Spong, devoted an entire book to the investigation of Biblical literalism, or inerrancy, embraced by so called contemporary fundamentalists, and their rejection of scientific empiricism (Spong, 1991). Spong is essentially describing the “brand loyalty” of a specific population of church goers, who are individually unaware of the bible itself, its history, relevance, and meaning, but rather rely on the interpretation of it provided by their minister or church doctrine, that Spong believes to be equally ignorant of the text. Sadly, Spong is not much better than those he seeks to condemn as fools, he’s a globalist that embraces the fallacy of multiculturalism – but he’s right on about the vast majority of those that refer to themselves as Christians and their unbelievable ignorance of history and geography.

Indeed, even the traditional macroeconomic view of advertising “holds that the main purpose of advertising is to manipulate or persuade” (McConnel, Campbell, Brue, 1996). Read those words again, “manipulate and persuade!”

Another very interesting and perhaps persuasive force contributing to opinion formation and the role the media plays is put forth by zoologist Desmond Morris (1969). “In addition to law, custom, language, and religion there is another, more violent form of cohesive force that helps to bind the members of a super-tribe “society” together, and that is war” (p.32). This is an interesting perspective if one looks for a moment at what happened as a result of September 11th, and the anthrax letters. There has been a declaration of war on terrorism. The enemy hasn’t been fully identified, the goals have not been fully established, and there is no end in sight, but yet the American people support it, or at least supported it up till now. As the American people become more informed, the alert individual can’t help but notice that the war of terror which originally was focused on without, i.e. the Mid East, has become more and more focused on the within, i.e. right here in the United States, slowly, imperceptively, the enemy has morphed from Islamo-Fascists to terrorists of the “Home grown” variety. I’ve got news for you America, our government is looking at US, you and I, especially if you’re not one of the aforementioned apathetic materialists – if you’ve got a mind and an informed opinion – YOU ARE THE TERRORIST!

Morris’s book, The Human Zoo (1969) is an excellent source of information pertinent to our modern era. “There has been a great deal of debate recently concerning the way in which modern mass-communication devices, such as televisions are shrinking the social surface of the world, creating a global televillage. It has been suggested that this trend will aid the move towards a genuinely International community. Unhappily this is a myth, for the single reason that television, unlike personal social intercourse is a one-way system” (1969, p. 36). Morris was right and wrong, television is a “one way system,” but it’s the perfect medium for ushering in the new world order, globalism or Internationalism, whatever you prefer to call it – communism to some.

Morris felt that humans were subject to forces encouraging conformity. An excellent example of the conformity principle is in the following. The external threat, “has such a powerful cohesive effect on the members of the threatened group that the leader’s task is in many ways made easier. The more daring and reckless he is, the more fervently he seems to be protecting the group who, caught up in the emotional fray, never dare question his actions (as they would in peace time), no matter how irrational these actions may be” (Morris, 1969, p. 53). Let me repeat the last sentence again, “The more daring and reckless he [the leader] is, the more fervently he seems to be protecting the group who, caught up in the emotional fray, never dare question his actions (as they would in peace time),no matter how irrational these actions may be.”

Does the War on Terrorism apply to this principle? Certainly President Bush’s popularity remained quite high initially despite the fact that he instituted many invasive and unconstitutional policies that would in all likelihood have never succeeded in the absence of an alleged external enemy – and in the case of Al Qaeda, a illusory enemy.

Perhaps this conformity principle plays some kind of role in the fact that we the American public seem satisfied at present with the information we’ve received and continue to receive from the government, by way of the media, and we do not feel the need to question higher authority at this time. OR, perhaps the media is not telling us just how many Americans are already questioning the authority of our government at this very moment.

Wake up America, the Zio-American government is very close to committing another act of terror on American soil that will dwarf what they did on 9-11. Will you be fooled again, will you allow them to conscript your sons and daughters and send them overseas to kill and die for Israel and oil? There isn’t much time left…

[1] http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/

For sources see reference section HERE

US Banking Collapse ‘Imminent’

US Banking Collapse ‘Imminent’ Warns French Banking Giant

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

French banking giant Société Générale Group, through its subsidiary SG CIB, the 3rd largest corporate and investment bank in the Euro zone, has warned today in a confidential report that the American banking system is in danger of ‘imminent collapse’ due to the hedge fund failures at US banking giant Bear Stearns, a fear that is also being voiced in America, and as we can read as reported by the New York Times News Service:

"The two big Bear Stearns hedge funds that neared collapse last week were full of tricky investments tied to subprime mortgages. To try to ensure that hundreds of billions of dollars worth of similar investments don’t also plummet, endangering the financial system, Congress may finally have to do more to help lower-end borrowers. That, in turn, would prop up the investments based on their mortgages."

Though the United States Securities and Exchange Commission has opened an ‘informal’ investigation into the collapse of the Bear Stearns hedge funds, SG CIB warns in their report that a ‘series of cascading events’ leading to the ‘insolvency’ of the American banking system is now being ‘unleashed’, and as confirmed by Britain’s Telegraph News Service:

"The United States faces a severe credit crunch as mounting losses on risky forms of debt catch up with the banks and force them to curb lending and call in existing loans, according to a report by Lombard Street Research.

The group said the fast-moving crisis at two Bear Stearns hedge funds had exposed the underlying rot in the US sub-prime mortgage market, and the vast nexus of collateralised debt obligations known as CDOs.

"Excess liquidity in the global system will be slashed," it said. "Banks' capital is about to be decimated, which will require calling in a swathe of loans. This is going to aggravate the US hard landing."

Even more catastrophic to the World’s economic system being warned about by SG CIB was the near simultaneous warning this week of a Global Great Depression by the Bank for International Settlements, and as we can read as reported, also, by Britain’s Telegraph News Service:

"The Bank for International Settlements, the world's most prestigious financial body, has warned that years of loose monetary policy has fuelled a dangerous credit bubble, leaving the global economy more vulnerable to another 1930s-style slump than generally understood.

"Virtually nobody foresaw the Great Depression of the 1930s, or the crises which affected Japan and Southeast Asia in the early and late 1990s. In fact, each downturn was preceded by a period of non-inflationary growth exuberant enough to lead many commentators to suggest that a 'new era' had arrived", said the bank.

The BIS, the ultimate bank of central bankers, pointed to a confluence a worrying signs, citing mass issuance of new-fangled credit instruments, soaring levels of household debt, extreme appetite for risk shown by investors, and entrenched imbalances in the world currency system.

In a thinly-veiled rebuke to the US Federal Reserve, the BIS said central banks were starting to doubt the wisdom of letting asset bubbles build up on the assumption that they could safely be "cleaned up" afterwards - which was more or less the strategy pursued by former Fed chief Alan Greenspan after the dotcom bust.

It said this approach had failed in the US in 1930 and in Japan in 1991 because excess debt and investment build up in the boom years had suffocating effects.

While cutting interest rates in such a crisis may help, it has the effect of transferring wealth from creditors to debtors and "sowing the seeds for more serious problems further ahead."

The bank said it was far from clear whether the US would be able to shrug off the consequences of its latest imbalances, citing a current account deficit running at 6.5pc of GDP, a rise in US external liabilities by over $4 trillion from 2001 to 2005, and an unprecedented drop in the savings rate. "The dollar clearly remains vulnerable to a sudden loss of private sector confidence," it said."

These warnings could not have come at a worse time for the war weary United States as its National debt has risen to the catastrophic level of nearly $9 trillion and is increasing at the staggering rate of over $1 billion per day.

Though the Americans represent only 4 percent of the World’s population, their economy represents 18 percent World’s economy, meaning that the collapse of their banking system will indeed have an effect on all other Nations ability to survive a Global Depression.

Russia’s President Putin, and in his also knowing of the coming collapse of the Western World’s banking and trade systems, called this week for a new World Economic Order, and as we can read:

"Speaking to an audience of world leaders and chief executives at a showcase business forum in St. Petersburg, Putin said the emergence of developing economies “demands the creation of a new architecture of international economic relations based on trust and mutually beneficial integration”.

He added, “Structures that were made taking account of a small number of active members look archaic, undemocratic and inflexible... This is clearly visible in the example of the WTO”.

The Russian leader proposed the creation of “regional Eurasian free trade organizations” that would draw on the experience of the World Trade Organization.

Russia demonstrated its new economic clout during the two-day St. Petersburg International Economic Forum by agreeing to investment accords worth 13.5 billion dollars (10 billion euros), forum organizers said.

It seemed evident that the World’s business elite had accepted Putin’s assurances during the forum that Russia was a safe bet, in spite of rising tensions between Moscow and the West.

It also reflected a wider surge in developing economies that Putin said had turned the old world order on its head.

“If 50 years ago, the G8 countries accounted for 60 percent of the World’s GDP, the current situation is vice versa -- about 60 percent of world GDP is produced beyond their borders."

To the ability of the average American citizen being able to survive an economic collapse it no longer seems likely, and as we can read:

"Personal bankruptcies during the first G. W. Bush administration totaled nearly five million, a record for any single term in the White House.

Due to the harsh bankruptcy legislation passed by Congress in 2005 the number of bankruptcies has recently declined—at least in the short term. But by making it more difficult for families to free themselves from extreme debt burdens, this is certain to produce ever greater numbers of workers who are essentially “modern-day indentured servants.”

It is also worth noting that the similarities to the present horrific circumstance facing the American people is an, almost, exact mirror imagine of that faced by their ancestors of last century whose lives were altered forever by the event known as the Great Depression, and which saw the greatest political and social realignment the United States had seen since their Civil War Period of the mid 1800’s, both of which led to the strengthening of the Federal Government at the expense of the individual States and personal freedom.

And, as their 20^th Century ancestors had World War I, the realignment of the European Continent, the realignment of the Middle East, and the Spanish Flu Pandemic; today the Americans have a Global War on Terror, the uniting of the Nations of Europe into a single Union, another realignment of the Middle East, and the Bird Flu Pandemic.

“The more things change the more they stay the same” comes to mind in pondering that which is facing the American people today, but, perhaps, the more appropriate quote for these weary people were spoken by the 19^th Century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, and who in foreseeing the ‘plans’ of the World’s elite powers for humanity issued a warning to any, and all, who would listen, "Out of chaos comes order."

General Predicts Israel Will Attack Iran, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah, “al-Qaeda” this Summer

General Predicts Israel Will Attack Iran, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah, “al-Qaeda” this Summer

Tuesday June 26th 2007, 6:20 am

It is a provocative headline: “Israel braces for July war with up to five enemies.” If we are to believe Israeli military intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin, this attack will be launched by Iran, Syria, Hizbullah, Hamas and, of course, “al-Qaeda,” the database. “Each of these adversaries is capable of sparking a war in the summer,” Yadlin told the World Tribune. In other words, Israel is capable of attacking one or all of these “adversaries,” as Israel has a notorious history of attacking its neighbors under contrived pretense.

Few remember the words of the Irgun terrorist Menachem Begin, later Israeli prime minister—as Israelis, much like Americans, prefer to be led by terrorists and war criminals—who admitted in 1982 “that Israel had fought three wars in which it had a ‘choice,’ meaning Israel started the wars,” according to Donald Neff, writing for the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

Here is Begin’s quote in full: “In June 1967, we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that [Egyptian President] Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

As Livia Rokach writes in the introduction to Israel’s Sacred Terrorism, based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, the former Israeli prime minister, the “Israeli political/military establishment aimed at pushing the Arab states into military confrontations which the Israeli leaders were invariably certain of winning. The goal of these confrontations was to modify the balance of power in the region radically, transforming the Zionist state into the major power in the Middle East.” In order to realize this modification of power, Israel engaged in “military operations aimed at civilian populations across the armistice lines,” in particular against a defenseless Palestinian population, but also against Israel’s Arab neighbors, and these “operations [were] designed to dismember the Arab world, defeat the Arab national movement, and create puppet regimes which would gravitate to the regional Israeli power.”

“A clear, lucid, coherent logic runs through the history of the past three decades,” Rokach wrote in the 1980s. “In the early fifties the bases were laid for constructing a state imbued with the principles of sacred terrorism against the surrounding Arab societies on the threshold of the eighties the same state is for the first time denounced by its own intellectuals as being tightly in the deadly grip of fascism.”

“Lebanon was the model, prepared for its role by the Israelis for thirty years, as the Sharett diaries revealed,” explains Ralph Schoenman in his book, the Hidden History of Zionism. “It is the expansionist compulsion set forth by Herzl and Ben Gurion even as it is the logical extension of the Sharett diaries. The dissolution of Lebanon was proposed in 1919, planned in 1936, launched in 1954 and realized in 1982.” Schoenman cites Oded Yinon’s A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s, a document that “outlines a timetable for Israel to become the imperial regional power based upon the dissolution of the Arab states.”

In regard to Syria, Israeli peace activist Uri Avnery tells us the Zionist state created a convenient myth in order to escalate hostilities and thus steal land. “According to legend, the Syrians exploited their control of heights overlooking the Israeli villages in the valley below them. Again and again the evil Syrians (the Syrians were always ‘evil’) terrorized the helpless kibbutzim by shelling. This myth, which was believed by practically all Israelis at the time, served as a justification for the occupation of the Golan Heights and their annexation by Israel. Even now, foreign visitors are brought to an observation post on the Golan Heights and shown the defenseless kibbutzim down below.”

The truth, which has been exposed since then, was a bit different: Sharon used to instruct the kibbutzniks to go to their shelters, and then he would send an armored tractor into the demilitarized zone. Predictably, the Syrians shot at it. The Israeli artillery, just waiting for its cue, then opened up a massive bombardment of the Syrian positions. There were dozens of such “incidents.”

Earlier this month, Jan Muhren, a Dutch UN observer stationed interchangeably at the Golan Heights and the West Bank in 1966-67, told a Dutch current affairs program “neither Jordan nor Syria had any intention to start a war with Israel,” according to Monsters and Critics. Muhren said “Israel was not under siege by Arab countries preceding the Six-Day War … and that the Jewish state provoked most border incidents as part of its strategy to annex more land,” that is to say steal land at gunpoint, most notably from Syria, although the “war” resulted in the theft of Gaza and the West Bank from Egypt and Jordan respectively. As well, Israel grabbed the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt.

Once again, Israel is not “under siege by Arab countries,” or Hezbollah, Hamas, and the fantastical “al-Qaeda” for that matter, and yet we are told each “of these adversaries is capable of sparking a war in the summer.” Israeli officials, according to the World Tribune, “said Iran has direct influence over Syria, Hizbullah and Hamas. He said Al Qaida has increasingly come under Iranian influence and was being used by Iran and Syria in such countries as Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon.” In short, the Israeli “security myth” documented by Livia Rokach in the 1980s and in the current era buttressed by ludicrous fairy tales, is alive and well. Under such a “security” pretense, never examined by the corporate media, we can expect Israel, or more likely the United States, under an AIPAC and neocon zombie trance for some time now, to attack Iran and Syria, possibly next month, certainly before the Commander Guy leaves office.

Iraq was attacked and 750,000 Iraqis slaughtered in the name of “Israeli security,” that is to say Israeli hegemony. “Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I’ll tell you what I think the real threat (is) and actually has been since 1990—it’s the threat against Israel,” Philip Zelikow, Bush insider and former executive director of the nine eleven whitewash commission, told a crowd at the University of Virginia on September 10, 2002, according to Emad Mekay, writing for the IPS-Inter Press Service. Naturally, the corporate media completely ignored Zelikow’s comments.

As should be expected, the Likudniks and American neocons will demand, in the wake of Israel’s defeat to Hezbollah last summer, another go, this time making certain to accomplish their goals. Meyrav Wurmser, the Israeli married to the neocon David Wurmser, admitted as much last December. “Hizbullah defeated Israel in the war. This is the first war Israel lost,” she told Yedioth Internet. “I know this will annoy many of your readers… But the anger is over the fact that Israel did not fight against the Syrians. Instead of Israel fighting against Hizbullah, many parts of the American administration believe that Israel should have fought against the real enemy, which is Syria and not Hizbullah.” Wurmser, of course, is talking about the neocon part of the administration, the part that has control of American foreign policy. Iran, naturally, figures prominently on the target list as well. If the Israeli Likudniks and the American neocons have their way, Israel will have a second go this summer.

Dear Reader, How Much Proof Do You Need?

- by Terry Melanson ©, Nov. 15, 2004

“Our attention is always caught when a famous person or widely recognized authority speaks. Use this trait of human nature to help catch the attention of your readers. If a well known person made the statement you are planning to include in your essay, it is best to quote it directly, rather than paraphrase or summarize the passage.”

- CSU Writing Guide, Quoting Well Known Persons

On a few occasions I have been compelled to write something based solely upon an email I received regarding my site. Sometimes it was after I was made aware of additional information related to my research. Other times it was criticism that I felt needed a larger response than a simple email reply directed at a single individual. This is one of those times.

I won't divulge the name or email of the person who sent me the comments, and I won't quote it verbatim - mainly because it has horrendous spelling, grammar and it's poorly written. The gist of it, however, is that "I have no proof" other than "odd quotes." He was speaking generally about my new article on world government and social change agents, but then goes on to include the rest of my site in broad strokes; again, claiming that I have no proof.

Since he brought up the fact that I utilize quotes to support my assertions, I was left wondering exactly what constitutes "proof" in the eyes of most of the brainwashed public. The way I see it, quotes from the elite are the best proof we have. How much more of a smoking gun is there that secret machinations are hatched behind closed doors? The quotes that I reproduce throughout my site constitute an admission of guilt. They hang themselves with their own words:

"In the world as it is today, this institution can hardly be a universal Church. It is more likely to be something like a League of Nations. I will not prophesy. I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be — perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly ostracized and discredited"

- Arnold J. Toynbee, "The Trend of International Affairs Since the War," International Affairs, November 1931, p. 809

"Obviously our first step must be immediately to establish and advertise drastic policies designed to bring our own population size under control."

"...The first task is population control at home. How do we go about it? Many of my colleagues feel that some sort of compulsory birth regulation would be necessary to achieve such control. One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size."

- Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb, p.130-131

"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

- David Rockefeller, on record as stating in 1973 about Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times 8-10-73)

"We shall have a World government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

- James Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, before the U.S. Senate

"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels."

- Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund - quoted in "Are You Ready For Our New Age Future?," Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December '95

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."

- Aldous Huxley's lecture to The California Medical School in San Francisco in 1961

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."

- Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter - quoted in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June '96

"The war against terrorism is a new kind of war."

"This new paradigm renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions."

- Alberto Gonzales, 1/25/02 Memorandum For the President (PDF); Newsweek, 5/24/04

It's not me who would like to see the world population at "95% [of the] present levels." But I'm not a billionaire, and I certainly can't afford to give away a cool billion to the U.N. to help in my lofty goal of population reduction. My friends and associates aren't the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds and the likes of Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev.

It's not me who reminisces about my colleagues wanting to add "sterilants to water supplies or staple food." My buddies won't have access to "doses of the antidote." After all, they would be "carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size." No friend of mine has ever advocated a "compulsory birth regulation." But then again, my peers aren't the most powerful businessmen and politicians in the world, either. It wasn't my predictions on the coming disaster associated with the population explosion that have been discussed at global governance forums, Bilderberg meetings, or United Nations sponsored population control conferences.

It's not me who praises the achievements of mass murderers like Mao Tse Tung. A direct quotation like that wouldn't have made it into my memoirs either. No, I'm not the current head of the Rockefeller dynasty. I have never been the chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations and I didn't create the Trilateral Commission. Time Magazine hasn't labeled me "the prime mover in banking that controls the course of world economic affairs and history." 1 The emperor of Japan has never, matter-of-factly, proclaimed to the press that I "outrank royalty." 2

It's not me who calls for "world government" by "consent or conquest." I've never had the privilege of speaking to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Paul Warburg, one of the original members of the Council on Foreign Relations, isn't my father. No, you see, my old man wasn't privy to the secret meeting on Jekyll Island that hashed out the Federal Reserve System; and once the bill was passed, Woodrow Wilson certainly never appointed him as a member of the Federal Reserve Board.

It's not me who predicted the coming of a "pharmacological method of making people love their servitude" to create a "dictatorship without tears." I have never told an audience of medical students and professors that soon there will be drugs to create a "painless concentration camp for entire societies." Nope, I've never written a seminal work on the uses of psychedelic drugs for transcendent mystical experiences and profoundly influenced the entire generation of the 1960s counterculture.

Its not me who would just love to be reincarnated as a "killer virus to lower human population levels." I have not an ounce of Blue Blood coursing through my veins! Besides, who on earth would take a member of the British Royal Family seriously?

It's not me that admitted to working "discreetly" to "to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world." I wasn't one of the chief architects of the Gospel of Globalism espoused by the Cecil Rhodes Round Table group.

I'm sorry but I have never advised the President that the "war on terrorism ... renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions." I've also never been chosen by the President to be the next Attorney General. If that were the case then I wouldn't at all be surprised if my past record came back to haunt me.

I haven't put words in their mouths. Those statements weren't recorded under duress. A knife wasn't held to anyone's throat to extract a confession. Yet, there it is. I could write a whole book filled with the damning words that spew from their filthy mouths. That's why I refuse to call it conspiracy "theory." There's no theory about it. What part of "proof" don't you understand? If that's what they say in the open, imagine what goes on behind closed doors.

Interview with Author Terry Melanson of conspiracyarchive.com
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Melanson.php
http://vyzygoth.com/audio/melanson6-18-07.mp3

Lee Rogers Interviews Ron Paul Part #1

Out of 11 mainstream media polls, Ron Paul has decisively won every online poll by as much as 77 percent. Yet none of these media outlets (FOXMSNBCCNNABCCBSNBCPBS) have reported this. Do you know why? Listen to this and you'll begin to understand...

Part 1





Part 2



Part 3




Part 4

cia to release details on decades of secrets

cia to release details on decades of secrets
cia to release details on decades of secretsfrom reuters: The Central Intelligence Agency is declassifying hundreds of pages of documents on secret operations from over three decades ago, CIA Director Michael Hayden said.

The so-called "Family Jewels" document overseas assassination attempts, domestic spying, kidnapping and infiltration of leftist groups from the 1950s to the 1970s, according to a summary posted on the Web site of the National Security Archive at George Washington University.

The documents to be released next week also include accounts of break-ins and theft, surveillance of U.S. journalists, the agency's opening of private mail to and from China and the Soviet Union, and "behavior modification" experiments on "unwitting" U.S. civilians.

"Much of it has been in the press before, and most of it is unflattering, but it's the CIA's history," Hayden said in a speech on Thursday to the American Foreign Relations Conference.

"This is about telling the American people what we have done in their name," Hayden said.

The CIA chief said the documents provide a glimpse of "a very different time and a very difference agency."

Hayden said 147 documents, 11,000 pages of analysis done between 1953 and 1973, would be available on the CIA's Web site.

Labels: assassination, black ops, cia, cointelpro, nsa, secrecy, video

US Govt Admits Lyme Disease a Bioweapon

The existence of the Lyme disease epidemic is officially covered up in the UK, its myriad presentations routinely misdiagnosed as everything from "M.E." to MS to hypochondria. This is the first admission by a US government body that the cause is an incapacitating biowar agent.

"SAN ANTONIO (AP) -
The $10.6 million Margaret Batts Tobin Laboratory Building will provide a 22,000-square-foot facility to study such diseases as anthrax, tularemia, cholera, lyme disease, desert valley fever and other parasitic and fungal diseases.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified these diseases as potential bioterrorism agents.".

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10039154/


This is the first admission by a US government body that Lyme disease is a biological warfare agent. This is the reason that hundreds of thousands of men, women and children around the world have been left to rot with wrong diagnoses, or have had their Lyme disease acknowledged but been told that it is an "easily-treated" disease, given 3 weeks' antibiotics, then told to shove off when their symptoms carried on after that.

In Britain the existence of the epidemic is denied completely, and virtually no effort made to warn or educate the public about the dangers of ticks, which carry the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi.

The Borrelia genus has been a subject of biowar experimentation at least as far back as WW2, when the infamous Japanese Unit 731, which tortured and experimented on live prisoners, studied it.

The reality is, Lyme disease is for many a chronic, horrendous, incapacitating disease producing crippling fatigue, constant pain, loss of memory, possible paralysis, psychosis, blindness and even death.

It was an ideal biowar agent because it evades detection on routine tests, has an enormous range of different presentations, and can mimic everything from ADHD to multiple sclerosis to carpal tunnel syndrome to rheumatoid arthritis to chronic fatigue syndrome (M.E.) to lupus to schizophrenia. Enemy medical staff would never know what had hit them, nor even that ONE illness had hit their population, rather than an unexplained rise in dozens of known conditions.

Honest doctors and scientists who tried to treat or research Lyme disease according to ethical principles have been viciously persecuted by government-backed organisations in the US, Europe and elsewhere. Many specialists in the US were threatened with loss of their license or had anonymous, false allegations sent to the medical board, which tied them up in mountains of paperwork and legal fees...some were forced out of medicine or even driven to suicide.


Instead, medical disinfo agents, most of whom have a background in military/biowarfare units, such as Dr Allen Steere, Mark Klempner, Philip Baker, Edward McSweegan, David Dennis, Alan Barbour etc were enabled to assume top positions in Lyme research , CDC, NIH etc from where they issued false information , covering up the true seriousness and chronic nature of the disease, and comdemned untold numbers to a living hell.

Please help Lyme patients publicise this scandal, which has caused suffering on a massive scale. Contact me by email if you are interested in helping. Thank you.

Lisa

Lymerayja
e-mail: lymerayja@yahoo.co.uk
Homepage: http://www.lyme-rage.info